24 Mar

Life After Condenser Gpm per Ton

The second stage increases efficiency by letting the compressor to operate at a lowly capacity whenever your demand is low. Before you start any DIY geothermal project you need to consider what kind of ground network you’re likely to use. The Chiller Plant is an important energy consuming procedure. It’s possible for you to wash many vegetables without needing to change the water. It’s possible for you to rinse your dishes just as well in the event you fill up a pan (or just a bowl) with a little water and use this to rinse things off before loading the dishwasher. If you take advantage of a dishwasher, be certain to run full loads only. You may need to turn on the faucet here and there, but overall, you are going to use an extremely small quantity of water to receive the same job done.

Condensers are categorized by their cooling process. This is among the eco-friendly reasons to use this kind of condenser. Use this handy guide to assist you determine when to use which kind of cooler.

Both sorts of systems have their own benefits and pitfalls, and can be practical for different cooling requirements and situations. The system is comparatively easy and simple to fix. In real life, even constant volume systems probably aren’t perfectly constant volume. And since the system is warming your skin directly at precisely the same time that it warms the air of your home, you feel warmer at a lower temperature setting, which enables you to keep the home cooler, saving energy. An open loop process is not as common, you will need to get an ample supply of ground water. Geothermal open loop techniques interact directly with well water as a way to heat and cool your property. Cooling equipment inside this matter increases its efficiency by offering a steady thermal atmosphere.

Add in the water heater and you’ve got a comprehensive heat and hot water system which costs under a single low-efficiency furnace. The water that doesn’t evaporate is recirculated with a pump. In this process, it is pumped back into the water source through a separate discharge well. This chilled water then cools a bigger area, like a factory floor. Try out a few loads on the cycle that utilizes the least water and energy and see whether the outcomes are satisfactory. If you get bottled water since you donat like the water from your tap, put in a water filtration system to help boost the flavor and remove impurities. You will use a great deal less water as time passes in doing this.

Yes, some individuals will have the ability to install their full geothermal heat pump without specialized help. A similar thing occurs when you modulate the valves that supply the cooling tower bypass function. RV water pumps are rather simple devices.

Any superior electrician shouldn’t have a problem connecting a geothermal unit. This isn’t always a simple situation to change in your present house, but is a significant element to take into account while shopping for your next one. Not only does this burn a whole lot of money, it also ruins your clothes! In case you have any debt, the library ought to be your default since buying books can accumulate. The savings don’t stop at electricity costs, however, the DSXC180481 is made for quick installation and maintenance too. Real energy savings have to be measured on a yearly basis. The downside to this DIY geothermal installation is that the majority of individuals don’t have a handy lake or pond near their property.

18 Mar

If You Read Nothing Else Today, Read This Report on Condenser Instrument Dental

By the close of the consultation you should feel fully informed about your condition and have an awareness of the treatment choices available to you, along with the chances of success. Also great on endothelial function that’s key for preventing cardiovascular disease. Complete oral wellbeing and total medical state of your body has to be essentially determined before you pick any of the cosmetic dentistry procedure. Good oral hygiene care is a significant facet to keep healthful way of life and shouldn’t be ignored. After the Invisalign therapy, patients will have the ability to eat, speak, and go through life better. A superb clinic will have specialists in various disciplines.

Dentistry has numerous tools with assorted sizes to execute several investigations. Your dentist will initially examine and earn a radiograph, in other words, tooth picture. Thus, it’s only a dentist that could carry on with the practice. Our Dentist will pick the material is dependent on the certain circumstances. In fact, the majority of dentists who offer Invisalign will have the ability to offer you the treatment at prices that are competitive to conventional braces. Knowing your teeth are getting straighter, without needing to be concerned about people staring at you, is really a rewarding feeling and it is going to cause you to feel better about your smile. The absolute most distal implants were angled in order to prevent the maxillary sinus cavities and any augmentation in that region.

condenser instrument dental

Consult your dentist which option will be ideal for you. Based on the harshness of your tooth decay, several therapy options are available which will help to get rid of the reason for enamel-destroying bacteria in your mouth, and repair the damage which has been done to your teeth. There are just a few treatment choices for OSA, Shantzer stated. Contemplating the clinic setup and cost of teeth-whitening procedures will also be useful. Now, there are lots of choices for the dentist to select from. While treating, it’ll be a better choice for those parents to remain outside the treatment room. Regardless of what age you’re, there are several various alternatives for straightening your teeth if your smile isn’t at its optimal.

Avoid touching the interior of the surgical drape where the instruments will be put. The majority of the dental instruments are composed of stainless steel and BPA free plastic. Sterilizationvarious tools are needed for sterilization. An obstetrician’s surgical kit is supplied for every shipping room.

If plaque is permitted to accumulate, it causes inflammation of the face of the gums that’s referred to as gingivitis’. The bacteria inside plaque release toxins that could damage the gums. It’s common that braces are work along with the appliance or following the appliance comes off, in order to produce minor adjustments. Unfortunately, a lot of people look to prevent dental braces since they don’t want metal frafmes and brackets placed in their teeth.

The Basic Facts of Condenser Instrument Dental

Many techniques of instrument reprocessing are readily available. Invisalign is not only going to help you have straighter teeth, but nevertheless, it’ll also supply you with a more healthy oral foundation. Teeth-whitening trays, gels, toothpastes and strips are some of the the solutions that it is possible to use at home. Dr. Roy B. Kupsinel an authority in the area of Mercury Amalgam Toxicity has four kinds of health conditions that occur with mercury. There is a particular branch of dentistry in the specialty of the medical science that addresses the problems linked to the teeth children.

13 Mar

Top Tips of Condenser Leak Repair

condenser leak repair

If the gauges drop, there’s a leak. In the majority of cases, leaking in your refigerator signals that the drain tube is blocked. If there’s a significant leak, then you’ll want to replace that part. Try to see whether it’s possible to locate a leak in the computer system.

Lies You’ve Been Told About Condenser Leak Repair

In case the AC doesn’t appear to work, step one would be to check whether the refrigerant is leaking out. Start the engine and check both AC hoses close to the firewall. Another principal reason the AC doesn’t work in a vehicle is due to a compressor issue. Take your vehicle to an auto repair shop that are expert at AC repairing.

Things You Won’t Like About Condenser Leak Repair and Things You Will

Examine the voltage with a voltmeter in the event the compressor is working. If it doesn’t move, then you are in need of a new compressor before continuing. In case the compressor makes a good deal of noise or the clutch isn’t going to engage properly, additionally, it takes a compressor. In the event the compressor isn’t on, the issue might be a matter of power to the system, a poor control head on the dash or no Freon. The compressor of your vehicle won’t turn on, if there’s low refrigerant.

The compressor is simply working whenever you have the air conditioning on. In the event the compressor runs but the fan doesn’t, the possibilities are good you will want to replace the fan’s motor. Check under the hood to determine whether the magnetic clutch on the AC compressor engages.

If it starts to rise, there’s a leak, and atmospheric pressure is rushing into the air-conditioning system. Coolant leaks can be readily repaired by ac specialists who will have the vital equipments to reestablish the ac unit to its usual operation. They are generally easy to find, but are very hard to be fixed. You will have the ability to find the leak with the distinctive glasses and light.

New Questions About Condenser Leak Repair

To better understand where the problem lies, it’s important to understand a bit about the elements of your auto AC. Sometimes, the issue with air conditioning systems don’t involve any of the components. Knowing the fundamental elements of your system can help you diagnose problems and decrease the total amount of time a repairman might need to spend at your home, therefore reducing cost and ensuring that the right parts are on the truck when he arrives.

As there are several parts involved, the very first issue is to check the system from inside the vehicle and see exactly what is going on so there’s a proper place to begin searching for an issue. If you would like to fix the system totally, you might want to acquire the entire system replaced from a reputable vehicle technician. If it doesn’t, the system could be low on refrigerant. The system could be low on refrigerant in the event the magnetic clutch doesn’t do the job. To be accomplished correctly, every air-conditioning system has a certain quantity of refrigerant oil dependent on the duration of hoses for the system. An ac system has many sections. It is an inherent and important part of the car, and is responsible for providing cooling to the passengers.

10 Mar

Condenser Noisy – the Conspiracy

condenser noisy

When you have noise emanating from the base of your refrigerator, it’s likely coming from one of two places. If it isn’t the compressor that’s making the noise, you should examine the fan close to it. Otherwise, most refrigerator noise is fairly straightforward to spot and not very hard to repair.

Compressors are the center of a refrigerator. The compressor can be found in a football-sized case on the rear of the refrigerator, near the base of the unit, and usually contains either black or copper tubes with an assortment of colored wires. More frequently than not, it’s the compressor of the machine that’s making the sound.

If you wish to wash the coil, you will need to open a panel at the back, which ought to be diagrammed in your owner’s manual. The condenser coil another major portion of your fridge people don’t know to clean. The condenser coil is the outside part of your air-conditioning system.

IF the fan isn’t running producing is making a great deal of noisy it will need to be replaced. If he turns freely, you need to check its windings for continuity. A fan close to the compressor prevents overheating so that the cooling procedure is efficient and potent. Compressor fans are somewhat more challenging to access since they are on the base of the refrigerator, but replacement fans are offered for purchase for around $60 as of 2010.

In the event the refrigerator appears to hum all of the time or the humming sound is quite loud, however, some investigation is necessary. If it is not cooling, its really a problem because it is a big possibility that all of your food that requires refrigeration will spoil. A noisy refrigerator is not just annoying, it’s embarrassing of guests come over. Most refrigerators make a decent sum of noise when running.

The Secret to Condenser Noisy

If you are in possession of a self-defrosting unit, the very first place you are going to want to check is the condenser fan. In the event the condenser unit will not turn off, the contactor is possibly faulty or only dirty. A typical ac condenser unit has two kinds of capacitors.

The compressor is typically a sealed unit, therefore it cannot be replaced by means of a do-it-yourselfer. A compressor can get overheated in the event the condenser coils are dirty. In case the compressor runs but the fan doesn’t, the possibilities are good you will want to replace the fan’s motor. Although refrigerator compressors are made to run for a number of decades, it’s possible yours might be broken and could want to get replaced. The compressor on a Frigidaire refrigerator can be found in the rear of the refrigerator, near the base of the appliance. The compressor that’s accountable for producing the cooling properties of your refrigerator also generates a substantial quantity of heat.

Lies You’ve Been Told About Condenser Noisy

In case the compressor is excessively noisy, it will likely need to be replaced by means of a service professional. Compressors are costly, and it can create more sense to replace the refrigerator. Find the condenser coils, which might be next to or underneath the compressor, or else they may be on the rear of the appliance. In the event the compressor isn’t running, or if you’re able to hear clicks as it repeatedly tries unsuccessful to begin, you might need to replace the compressor. A faulty compressor can also result in an air conditioner not to begin. An inefficient pumping compressor can result in a system problem and will get the refrigerator to overfreeze.

22 Sep

SEIU Attack Black Tea Party Patriot & Tampa Town DNC Slaps Man

Now Obama is sending the Service Employees International Union (SEIU) to beat up Tea Party People. So last night in St Louis they beat up a black man who was handing out buttons and flags as a protest against the runaway out of control federal government.

President Obama has said that the “tea party patriots” who have questioned his plan for the takeover of health care by the government are using “mob tactics.” Here is a quick video of Moveon.org, SEIU, and DNC using “mob tactics.” We are just a group of grassroots activists that want our elected representatives to have full and open debate on health care reform. In this video patriots our verbally and physically attacked by DNC mob members. At the Tampa Town Hall, a guy was “slapped” by a local Democrat treasurer. Other people were pushed out of the room, just for questioning the health care bill.

22 Aug

97% of Bus Drivers Say Remove Union, SEIU’s Bad Druggist Policy

Hello, and welcome to this week’s Right to Work news update.

In Monroeville, Pennsylvania, Gateway School District’s bus drivers have won the right to a secret-ballot vote to determine whether if they want to remove the Amalgamated Transit Union from their workplace.

The bus drivers will finally have a chance to vote on June 27, after 102 of the roughly 105 bus drivers signed the fourth petition they filed with the National Labor Relations Board asking for the secret-ballot election four times.

ATU Local 1729 officials moved to block the workers’ petitions, but late last week, the NLRB Regional Director ruled in favor of the workers’ latest request for an election.

In other news, a Santa Clara Valley Medical Center pharmacist has filed a state charge against a local union for illegally refusing to honor her right to refrain from full dues-paying union membership.

Han Kwan Wong filed the charge with the California Public Employment Relations Board against Service Employees International Union Local 521 for illegally forcing her into full union dues payments against her will.

In December 2013, Wong attempted to hand deliver a letter to SEIU Local 521 notifying the union hierarchy that she was exercising her right to refrain from formal union membership. Wong then sent a certified letter to the union hierarchy. SEIU Local 521 union officials responded by acknowledging Wong’s resignation letter but still continue to extract full union dues from her paychecks — claiming the union membership resignation did not meet the union’s criteria.

Wong’s charge seeks an acknowledgment from the union that she is no longer a union member, an independently-audited breakdown of union expenditures, a refund of illegally-seized forced union dues from her paychecks dating back to December, and the posting of notices in the workplace informing workers of their right to refrain from union membership.

Thank you for watching today’s Right to Work news update. See you next week.

22 Jul

Labor Union Responses to Workplace Violence 1998 SEIU

Labor unions use a variety of strategies to reduce workplace violence, including forming joint labor/management programs, filing complaints with enforcement agencies, negotiating contract language, and working for passage of state and federal legislation. Cooperative programs in which management voluntarily “does the right thing” are usually the most effective. These programs are positive and usually experience less management resistance than actions imposed on management as the result of a grievance or citation from an outside agency.

However, cooperative programs require strong management commitment, good labor relations, meaningful worker participation, and healthy organizational culture. These positive factors are rare in today’s workplaces. When unions cannot gain cooperation from management in dealing with workplace violence, traditional adversarial tactics may be employed, including filing grievances, OSHA complaints, mass petitions, press actions, and working for new legislation. For more, read Jonathon’s Rosen’s article, A labor perspective of workplace violence prevention, at http://www.ajpmonline.org/article/S07… .

Workplace violence is any act or threat of physical violence, harassment, intimidation, or other threatening disruptive behavior that occurs at the work site. It ranges from threats and verbal abuse to physical assaults and even homicide. It can affect and involve employees, clients, customers and visitors. Homicide is currently a leading cause of fatal occupational injuries in the United States. According to the Bureau of Labor Statistics, of the 4,547 fatal workplace injuries that occurred in the United States in 2010, 506 were workplace homicides. Homicide is the leading cause of death for women in the workplace. Nearly 2 million American workers report having been victims of workplace violence each year. Unfortunately, many more cases go unreported.

Factors that may increase the risk of violence include exchanging money with the public and working with volatile, unstable people. Working alone or in isolated areas may also contribute to the potential for violence. Providing services and care, and working where alcohol is served may also impact the likelihood of violence. Additionally, time of day and location of work, such as working late at night or in areas with high crime rates, are also risk factors that should be considered when addressing issues of workplace violence. Among those with higher risk are workers who exchange money with the public, delivery drivers, healthcare professionals, public service workers, customer service agents, law enforcement personnel, and those who work alone or in small groups. In most workplaces where risk factors can be identified, the risk of assault can be prevented or minimized if employers take appropriate precautions. By assessing their worksites, employers can identify methods for reducing the likelihood of incidents occurring.

A well written and implemented Workplace Violence Prevention Program, combined with engineering controls, administrative controls and training can reduce the incidence of workplace violence. For much more on workplace violence, go to the OSHA webpage athttp://www.osha.gov/SLTC/workplacevio…, the NIOSH webpage at http://www.cdc.gov/niosh/topics/viole… . This 1998 video, PRIVATE HORROR/PUBLIC ISSUE: ON THE JOB ASSAULT (17 min), was created by the Service Employees International Union (SEIU). This video provides a graphic depiction of the problem of workplace violence, especially for those who work in healthcare, offices, or other so-called safe environments. Using several case histories, including interviews with victims of workplace violence, emphasis is placed on workers’ rights and union efforts to prevent violence on the job.

22 Jun

SEIU Exposed: SEIU Assaulted Workers During Corporate Campaign

Rather than allow workers a private ballot, SEIU engaged in a corporate campaign in an effort to coerce workers into their union.

True Card Check Story of SEIU and U.S. Labor Coordinated Abuse

This is an important story in these times of the Big Labor takeover of the Federal government. This documented true story that contains Card Check abuse, SEIU physical violence against workers, SEIU abuse of the NLRB system, orchestrated false allegations, and a corrupt Clinton appointee; and you can see and hear about what happens when Big Labor Bosses control a presidents administration like they do today.

Mr. Randy Schabers story begins with the discovery of an ongoing SEIU card check forced unionism scheme that included harassing employees at their homes. Mr. Schaber offered to hold an NLRB sanctioned secret ballot election.

The SEIU organizers replied, We will never let your employees have a secret ballot election. Then, Mr. Schaber began to feel the pain that SEIUs corporate campaign is designed to inflict.

To hear Mr. Schaber tell the story in his own words, we recommend that you listen and watch his full interview (links to parts 1, 2, and 3) or for a brief description view his shortened interview. You will be amazed at the abuse of federal power coordinated by SEIU in the 1990s when they had less control of the White House than they do today.

For more information, you can download the edited version of the U.S. House of Representatives Report that discusses SEIUs corporate campaign and the U.S. Department of Labors abuses that Mr. Schaber suffered and eventually resulted in the dismissal of a Clinton appointee.

The following are quotes from that U.S. House of Representatives report:

Corporate campaigns

John Sweeney, President of the AFLCIO, declared a new direction for the international labor unions that the Federation represents. Mr. Sweeney declared that labor would become far more militant in the pursuit of organizing and collective bargaining objectives. The term used to organize formally non-union corporations became known as corporate campaigns.

A corporate campaign has several distinct elements. Two of the most prominent elements are: having the target company perceived negatively by the companys investors, customers, employees and the public, and initiating enforcement and oversight actions by federal, State, and local governmental agencies. In other words, organized labor in a corporate campaign does not necessarily target the employees of the corporation as it had done historically, but rather focuses on corporate management.

Perhaps Stephen Lerner, Organizing Director of the Service Employees International Union said it best—

Instead of asking, How do we win a majority of (employee) votes?, we should be asking, How do we develop power to force employers to recognize the union and sign a contract.


22 May

Illinois Governor Battles Government Union Dons

201503nl05Last summer, thanks to the persistence and clear thinking of National Right to Work Legal Defense Foundation attorneys and eight Illinois home care providers whom they represented free of charge, the U.S. Supreme Court seriously undermined a precedent that had bolstered monopolistic unionism for 37 years.

In 1977’s Abood v. Detroit Board of Education, Justice Potter Stewart, joined by five of his colleagues, had invoked a strained and constricted reading of the First Amendment in order to uphold the imposition on union nonmembers of compulsory financial support for government unions’ bargaining activities.

But in June 2014, Justice Sam Alito’s 5-4 majority opinion in Harris v. Quinn marked a clear break from the pro-forced unionism-in-government stance the High Court had taken in Abood.

At a minimum, Mr. Alito’s opinion made it plain that putative “labor peace” is not an all-purpose excuse for sanctioning the extraction of forced dues and fees from Americans for government union-boss representation they don’t want, and never asked for.

Current Supreme Court Majority Doubts That Forced Dues Are Constitutional

Mark Mix, president of the National Right to Work Committee as well as the Foundation (the Committee’s sister organization), explained the significance of the Harris decision:

“Justices Alito, Kennedy, Roberts, Scalia and Thomas agreed that the state of Illinois was not the home care providers’ common-law employer or their sole employer and so concluded that the Abood excuse for compelling employee financial support for unions did not apply to them.

“Since the plaintiffs were not employed in any government workplace, their exercise of their right not to bankroll an unwanted union could not even theoretically pose a threat to ‘labor peace’ in the workplace, as the Abood opinion had envisioned.

“Because it was found not to be an applicable precedent, Abood was neither upheld nor overturned.

“However, even as it left Abood standing, the Harris opinion concurred with the plaintiff’s counsel of record, William Messenger, and other Right to Work attorneys that there are profound flaws in this precedent’s reasoning.

“For example, Justice Stewart’s opinion supposed it would be relatively easy to distinguish government union bosses’ political activities, which nonmembers could not be constitutionally forced to bankroll, from their bargaining activities, for which forced nonmember fees could be exacted.

“But unlike in the private sector, Mr. Alito noted, where bargaining is directed at the employer and political advocacy is directed at the government, ‘in the public sector, both collective-bargaining and political advocacy and lobbying are directed at the government.’

“The Harris majority concluded that Abood is a ‘questionable’ precedent. Of course, that means that the constitutionality of public-sector forced union dues is also ‘questionable.’”

Last summer, this Newsletter reported that the Harris decision had “cast into grave doubt whether state laws and other policies authorizing the forced extraction of union dues from public servants are permissible under the First Amendment.”

Bruce Rauner Wields His Executive Power to Protect State Employees

However, the August 2014 cover story added, “at least for the near future, the task of actually eliminating these constitutionally dubious statutes and policies has been left to state legislative and executive officials.”

One state elected official who has made it clear to his constituents and concerned citizens across the country that he understands it is his responsibility to defend the Constitution is Illinois GOP Gov. Bruce Rauner, a former businessman who took office just a couple of months ago.

As the chief executive of a state in which Big Labor has a lock grip on both chambers of the Legislature, Mr. Rauner is very unlikely in the foreseeable future to get a chance to sign any statute revoking government union bosses’ forced-dues privileges.

That is not to say his hands are tied.

On February 9, in one of his first major actions as governor, Mr. Rauner exercised his executive power to stop state government union kingpins from raking in forced “agency” fees from thousands of civil servants who have chosen not to join the union that wields monopoly-bargaining power in their workplace.

The governor simultaneously announced that his administration would file a federal lawsuit asking for a determination as to whether public-sector forced union dues and fees are, as he believes, “unconstitutional.”

Until this case is resolved, the executive order provides that forced fees will continue to be deducted from the paychecks of state government employees, but the confiscated money will be put into an escrow account, rather than funneled into union coffers.

If and when the federal judiciary follows the logic of the Harris opinion and finds that government-sector forced union fees violate the First Amendment, the escrow money will be returned to the compulsory fee-payers.

‘That Is a Clear Violation Of [Public Servants’] First Amendment Rights’

Mr. Rauner forthrightly justified his bold action in a press release:

Employees who are “forced to pay unfair share dues” are “being forced to fund political activity with which they disagree. This is a clear violation of First Amendment rights — and something that, as governor, I am duty-bound to correct.

“ . . . Forced union dues are a critical cog in the corrupt bargain that is crushing taxpayers. Government union bargaining and government union political activity are inexorably linked.”

Almost immediately after Mr. Rauner announced that the state of Illinois would cease turning over forced employee fees to Big Labor until their constitutionality was resolved, government union bosses began venting their rage.

Roberta Lynch, director of Springfield-based Local 31 of the American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees, decried the executive order as a “scheme” and as an “abuse of power.”

Catherine Boardman, president of Gary, Ind.-based Local 73 of the Service Employees International Union, accused the governor of trying to “ruin the lives of working families in Illinois.”

Meanwhile, the Prairie State’s GOP establishment politicians were remarkably reluctant to defend their fellow Republican’s effort to defend civil servants’ constitutional rights to the best of his ability.

In fact, a few days after the executive order was issued, state Comptroller Leslie Munger, an unsuccessful 2014 GOP state House candidate whom Mr. Rauner himself had appointed after the elected comptroller died before taking office, announced she would not enforce it.

Ms. Munger claimed she had no choice but to defer to union-label state Attorney General Lisa Madigan’s (D) ill-supported opinion that, despite the clearly expressed doubts of the Supreme Court inHarris, public-sector forced union fees are constitutional.

‘I Will Support the Constitution of the United States’

Mark Mix commended Mr. Rauner for his executive order, and for going to federal court in an effort to ensure that, despite the opposition of his own appointed comptroller, deductions of forced agency fees from state employees cease and the confiscated money is ultimately returned to the employees.

“In Illinois,” Mr. Mix noted, “the governor, legislators, and other public officials solemnly swear or affirm as they are installed: ‘I will support the Constitution of the United States . . . .’

“Our Founding Fathers never envisioned that the judiciary alone would be able to ward off threats to Americans’ constitutional liberties. It’s long past time for elected officials to confront the danger to the First Amendment posed by forced unionism.”

Mr. Mix vowed that Committee strategists as well as Foundation attorneys would do everything possible to help Mr. Rauner accomplish his stated objective of ending compulsory unionism in public employment.

Source: https://nrtwc.org/illinois-governor-battles-government-union-dons/

22 Apr

SEIU and other unions facing crisis as disputes between and within unions escalate

The following is a lengthy discussion of the current developing situation within the Service Employees International Union (SEIU). While discussions of other unions may seem obscure, in fact the Service Employees Union’s (SEIU) current direction actually impacts millions of us outside their organization. A number of documents related to this analysis have been removed from this article for reasons of space here in Substance and are available on line and from Substance. Contact: Csubstance@aol.com or the author at red1pearl@aol.com.

For example, the SEIU leadership recently ordered all local affiliates to withhold their dues from central labor bodies which share information, develop local solidarity, and wage campaigns such as strike support, living wage and establish common political agendas. The reason? To stop all such union groups from having any relations with the California Nurses or their National Nurses Organizing Committee. Their crime? To organize and push publicly for single-payer universal health insurance, for good nurse: patio staffing rations, and to criticize and compete with SEIU. Among teachers, SEIU’s impact is being felt in larger and larger ways. In addition to this California blackmail, SEIU is currently trying to replace the existing teachers’ union in Puerto Rico who were forced to strike this past winter. In fact, the SEIU offered to break the strike with scabs. Teachers from that union are picketing SEIU’s quadrennial convention being held in Puerto Rico right now, the first week of June.

In Chicago’s public schools, SEIU (Local 73) is the second largest union representing CPS workers (with approximately 5,000 members in CPS), after the Chicago Teachers Union. The following article traces the current internal divisions and issues at stake for working people over the undemocratic, corporate-style, grow-at-any-price unionism pursued under SEIU President Andy Stern and shared to some extent by his opponents. The challenge for us all is to understand these developments and how things got this way and create organizations for a fighting alternative. Andy Stern has led the SEIU to double its size, now 1.9 million members, since he was appointed organizing director back in 1985. Much of this growth has come from deals with employers that win some gains while locking new workers into huge organizations where they have little say-so. As attached documents here show, Stern’s grow-the-union deals in northern Calif. have meant freezing workers out of contract negotiations, blocking their right to go public about health and safety issues, and locking them into no-strike contracts under pre-set ‘template’ agreements.

At the same time, Stern has called international union conferences that generated pressure on global employers. He has sponsored creative coalitions to support organizing drives here in the U.S. A mixed bag.

Sal Rosselli is the president of United Healthcare Workers – West (UHW) now with over 140,000 members. As such, he signed off on and enforced those very same agreements with nursing home operators in northern California that he now denounces Stern for. Rosselli casts this fight as one between ‘bottom-up’ and ‘top-down’ union models, but all that glitters is not gold . At the same time, he has generated more rank-and-file pressure on operators than other Calif SEIU locals, something not appreciated either by the operators or, apparently, by Stern. Again, a mixed bag. This is not a simple conflict between good and evil. Even as Rosselli now challenges Stern’s one man rule and favors membership election, he

The fight is heating up in the country’s largest union, SEIU, the Service Employees. It concerns insider in-fighting, yes, but expresses widespread worker disaffection with top-down, corporate-partner unionism. Millions of working people are fed up with frozen pay, disappeared benefits, and growing insecurity. All driven by Corporate America’s insatiable drive for higher profits and abetted by ineffective unions. SEIU workers are coming forward to make the union serve their needs. You can visit them at _www.seiu reform.org_ (http://www. Seiu reform.org) .

The challenge is “Can the SEIU activists create an alternative to the union-corporate partnership they confront?”

This conflict is personified in now-open conflict between United Healthcare West’s president, Sal Rosselli and SEIU’s national president, Andy Stern. offers no challenge to the fundamental direction of union partnership with corporate management to ‘add value’ to their bottom line. Instead, he favors more pressure but towards the same accommodation and using the union to help employers As I hope to show here, this partnership strategy has meant and must mean undermining workers’ strength, creating divisions, and even attacking workers who resist corporate-imposed conditions. It is complicated and needs our critical investigation if we’re to move towards an alternative outlook and leadership. This clearly is an opportunity to build an alternative to this union-management cooperation path both Stern and Rosselli share — along with most U.S. union leadership and many conservative members. This internal conflict is as old as capitalism itself — some workers and leaders choosing the conservative, ‘go-along-to-get along’ tack while others take up the militant, class – solidarity approach.

Internally, Stern models the SEIU on corporate forms, such as “Local” unions of 100- 150,000 members with power concentrated in a few hands that he controls. This model of ‘efficiency’ just happens to coincide with the widespread practice of breaking up smaller, local unions when militant, democratic leadership wins elected leadership. Faced with this, top leaders in many unions often take over such locals, called receivership. In fact, that’s exactly what the SEIU did when the famous Justice for Janitors rank-and-file organizers won all the seats they contested in their local’s elections after organizing and leading successful mass actions in L.A. back in 1991. SEIU’s leaders, John Sweeney and his VP, Andy Stern, put them in receivership and diluted their influence by merging it into a huge, statewide ‘local’. The union-liberal publicity machine was big on the janitors’ marches, but said little about this undemocratic takeover.

Stern’s combination of controlled activism and partnering with Corporate America has paid off; the SEIU is the fastest growing major union in the country at a time of steady decline in union membership. However, bigger isn’t always better. When such growth reduces workers’ actual power in the workplace and makes us dependent on the union’s political machine, we’re reduced to being bargaining chips. Passivity is not strength. Just look at what the insurance companies did when the hurricanes hit New Orleans — no pay off when the chips are down. Activism brings some results, not insurance policies.

“Union-corporate partnership: a wet blanket ”

In my experience, the union-corporate “partnership” Stern embodies and that Rosselli continues to champion is little more than a wet blanket. It makes union leaders into firemen who dampen or put out our resistance to corporate-imposed conditions. Such union corporate jr. partners don’t’ just sit back; to protect the sr. partner — corporate profits and power. Experience shows that they actively undermine workers in the fight for solidarity and power to stand up for our needs. Any resistance to corporate attacks and for a workers’ agenda must start from this reality: we have to fight on two fronts, not just one. Below are examples from PATCO, the UAW and AFSCME:

PATCO- it didn’t have to be a defeat In the critical 1981 PATCO strike, President Reagan fired 11,000 overstressed air traffic controllers and brought in scabs. Unions from across the country passed resolutions calling on the AFL-CIO to call a general strike to defeat this union busting. Instead, that leadership refused, holding fast to their union-corporate junior partnership, upholding the corporate ‘order’ over workers’ struggle.

Locally, here in Chicago, the president of the Chicago Federation of Labor, Robert Healey, threatened to cut off all union aid to the PATCO strikers if they dared hold a labor rally downtown and lead a motorcade to O’Hare International Airport to spark an airport shut down. The proposal and local contacts for the action came from a local group of radical worker – activists, something corporate partners like Healey feared like brain cancer. Such a powerful action might have turned the tide, shown the way forward around the inaction of the AFL leadership and most union bodies. Shutting down the country’s largest airport might have rallied and inspired wider sections of workers to effective action. It also would have shown workers that class struggle ideas can be useful. Healey spiked all this; the PATCO leaders caved under his threat. Healey was rewarded for his many years of such dependable service to Corporate America with an appointment to the Chicago branch of the Federal Reserve Board. The rest of us were treated to an onslaught against the working class that hasn’t stopped since.

“UAW firemen and the fallout”

Take the United Auto Workers’ political machine in Solidarity House. Once the giant of American labor, they’ve taken the big fall. Over the years, they’ve agreed to hundreds of thousands of job cuts .The rationale? To protect company profitability. Results? This past year, they agreed to 50 percent wage cuts for tens of thousands and accepted a deal where all retirees’ health benefits are underfunded by $14 Billion. Those working are screwed; those who made it to retirement face greater insecurity. This collapse opens the door for many more employers to cut wages and benefits. After all, if the once-mighty UAW stands for this, what’s to stop others?

Faced with the market competition inherent in capitalism, this dedication to the corporate bottom line means us going down with their ship. Anyone fighting to renew our unions must start with this reality if we’re to create an alternative. Otherwise, we’ve got no answer to the race to the bottom already under way.

“How did things get so bad in the UAW?” conditions and disrespectful treatment.

This already-radicalized layer of factory workers fought the conditions they faced in auto, steel and other industries. Fighting management, they ran into the a hidden reef— UAW political machine.

To fight speedup, these young workers sent a delegation to Japan to set common production speed standards directly with Japanese auto workers and their unions. They also sent out teams to various U.S. plants to make a common stand. To counter this, the UAW leadership machine attacked them and stirred up nationalist (“Buy American!”) and racist (“ It’s the Japs!”) sentiment. It got so bad that UAW officials and some auto workers smashed some auto workers’ Japanese-made cars in parking lots and several thugs actually murdered a Chinese man in Detroit under the impression he was Japanese. Domestically, the UAW machine pushed the company line of competition between domestic plants for work, called whipsawing — where each plant competes against others for work, all under the same UAW collaboration. It was competition vs. solidarity. The radical workers lost, a loss we all feel today. Lessons must be taken if we’re not to repeat that loss and that opportunity.

When these auto workers organized wildcat strikes against unsafe work and racist job practices, the same UAW machine brought out hundreds of supporters to attack their pickets with iron bars. When these workers ran slates for local office, the same machine stole elections and used openly racist and red-baiting tactics against the often Black-led upsurge. (Some history: Starting around the late 1960s, mostly young auto workers began to resist speedup and unsafe conditions. Many younger workers came to auto plants as combat vets from Vietnam or veterans of struggles here against racist conditions in the late ’60s and early ’70s. Both black and white, they were not prepared to quietly accept the dangerous this is visible in the movie “ Finally Got the News!” about the Detroit-based League of Revolutionary Black Workers.).

To fight back, auto workers ran into the partnership machine. The pro-civil rights, ‘progressive’ UAW leadership machine typified the ‘jr. partnership’ approach that Stern and Rosselli both share, There will be no advance for us if we don’t face and learn to grow under this reality.

“The AFSCME story, our experience”

In our union, AFSCME, my fellow-teachers and I got a similar education. When our local introduced a motion at our state convention calling for our state union, Council 31, to actively campaign for single-payer health coverage, the state leadership opposed the resolution even as they supported one that called for no action. Then, when we apparently won the vote, the Executive Director ruled against us and moved the agenda before we

could appeal.

In February 2003, our Local (3506) was five days from shutting down the City Colleges’ largest program with 60,000 GED and ESL students in a legally-sanctioned strike after three years of preparations. In the last day of scheduled negotiations, AFSCME’s state leadership told us that they’d label us a wildcat and sit back when management fired anyone they chose. You could feel the air pumped out of our lungs. When push came to shove, you could see which side they too were on.. “Class solidarity vs. class collaboration”

Hopefully, these examples and everyday life shows that union-corporate ‘cooperation’ really means isolating us as workers, playing divide-and-rule that protects corporate domination and union insiders’ perks. Of course, there were, are, and will be workers who have no taste for any challenges and who support this collaboration. Such divisions between conservative and militants are natural; there is no pure group just waiting for someone to call “Charge!” on their trumpets! All efforts to challenge the current path require open discussion and decisions by those committed to resistance and a real alternative. This is a profoundly political process. Clarity is critical. Ideas influence actions, so we must be able to investigate them and their usefulness for us — from Andy Stern’s to Karl Marx’s.

Since we are all connected by the global economic system, a genuine fight for an alternative path in SEIU would offer hope for us all. And especially now, as North America sinks further into economic turmoil, with bailouts for the mendacious corporate thieves and growing hardship for huge numbers of ‘ordinary’, i.e. working class, people. Right now, hunger gnaws at more bellies, here and globally. Food pantries here go empty while food riots

grow across the world. Now, more than ever, we must have vision, organization, and leadership that connects us as a class, local to global. This alone can brings our strengths together like tendons connect bone and muscles in our body.

How can we defend better union pay when most people around us are going down? Our reform groups must connect with the millions outside our unions or risk being isolated and defeated as ‘greedy unions who only look out for themselves’. Unions can take up this challenge and opportunity. Concretely, the SEIU activists can lead a fight for worker-patient conditions. They can unite with millions if they campaign for publicly – funded health care, against subsidies for the profiteers. They can seek allies and build bridges of solidarity in action for things most people need and support. This kind of strategy gives us ways to connect our common interests, concretely.

History gives us positive examples to learn from, for example, the Trade Union Educational League (TUEL) of the 1920s-30s,, led by the Communist Party and organized around the strategy of industrial unions vs. the conservative, narrow-interest AFL trade unions. This group was national, organized around an alternative path. Many of its members went on to help organize the breakaway Congress of Industrial Organizations (CIO) in the 1930s.

Right now, rail workers from many trade unions are forming a new, national organization called Rail Workers United. (www.railraod workers united. org_(http://www.railraodworkers united.org) ). It’s goal is to unite rail workers, beyond the narrow limits of each trade. While we lack any viable national left organization, we do have people coming forward, building towards broader solidarity unionism.

All that glitters is not gold

Such reform fights are not new; but how many have led to disappointment and greater hopelessness among workers? As everyone knows, ‘talking the talk’ isn’t ‘walking the walk’. We owe it to ourselves and so many others to take a careful look, to investigate some of the contradictory experience here and draw useful lessons. Creating an alternative to today’s corporate union partnership is a hard job. Part of that job means untangling workers’ interests from specific leaders who often use language of

democracy and workers’ power to cover their own aspirations and loyalty to corporate collaboration.

We see this today (April, 2008) with Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama using populist language of ‘the people vs. special interests’ to cover their own loyalty to Corporate America and its domination.. At the same time, many ‘union reformers’ have used similar appeals to gather discontent and lead it into the same dead end, only with news faces and under new banners. We saw this with John Sweeney and the New Voices winning AFL-CIO leadership in 1995. No fight. More sellouts. Some change.

Sal Rosselli’s challenge to some of Stern’s methods will come to a head at SEIU’s May 2008 convention. He’s proposed one-member, one-vote elections of national officers, not convention delegate elections. His proposals, while apparently democratic, do not in any way challenge SEIU’s current union-corporate partnership. Still, as Rosselli said in a recent interview , “The convention will not be the end” of this conflict. Rosselli has framed this as a fight over democratic, powerful, worker-based unions vs.,boss run, weak, sellout, corporate-style unionism. As stated and shown in the attached letter from UHW executive board workers, he has also sponsored real grass-roots worker activism. Still, some facts stand out as red flags, warning activists not to take things at face value:

• Rosselli agreed to and enforced for years the 2003 agreement that blocked nursing care workers in his local from making public management’s mistreatment of patients and overworking the workforce.

• Rosselli authorized the internal union study of that agreement’s harmful effects on workers and patients ONLY AFTER Stern threatened to take out 65,000 of Rosselli’s 140,000 members and AFTER Stern froze Rosselli out of negotiations.

• Rosselli practices corporate partnership with Kaiser Permanente , California’s largest health care provider. That partnership deal helped kill an organizing drive by California Nurses Association to force Kaiser to increase nursing staff care for patients; instead, corporate management now has veto power over any proposed workload changes.

Thus, we’ve got a fight within the ‘partnership’ camp, but bigger. Within this conflict, SEIU activists have organized a new group, called S.M.A.R.T with a website: _www.seiureform.org_ (http://www.seiu reform.org) .

The challenge is to build an opposition to Stern/Rosselli’s ‘partnership pact’ while building on the rank-and-file movement Rosselli has sponsored. The trick will be making concrete steps towards winning tangible reforms, in a way that also builds confidence, power and organization.

• Concretely, this starts from campaigning publicly for better conditions and more workers. Lerning from teacher’s union militants, one slogan could be “Our working conditions are your living conditions.”

• Another would be to campaign for publicly funded, national health care. This means breaking from deals to get more tax money for the profit-first operators in order to get some trickle-down for workers. That approach divides healthcare workers from others, taking our taxes to pay your employers, with peanuts for workers. Instead, campaigning for Canadian-style single-payer or the broader, British National Health Service mode would mean “Healthcare for All! Kick the profiteers our of our healthcare!” A path towards unity and real gains, not peanuts and passivity.

“fighting with one arm tied behind our backs”

The current mantra in some union reform movements is ‘rank and file democracy’ as if this alone will solve our problems. I disagree. Democracy and worker-based resistance are absolutely necessary to stand up to corporate greed and their attacks on workers, period.

What’s more, democracy enables us to find the best path, the best ideas, choose the best leaders and hold them accountable. This also teaches us to work together, to plan for our common good. Thus, we build for now and prepare the ground for a future social system based on meeting everyday life needs for all, based on actual solidarity, with respect for all,and the growth of everybody’s potential. Democracy is vital, like oxygen.

Even so, democracy alone is not enough. It’s like running a race on one good leg. Not enough, is it? Would you want to fight with one

arm against a powerful opponent with two good arms? Simply opposing the hardships of the corporate agenda is not enough. Rank-and-file democracy alone does not tell us how to fight the corporate agenda and power. We need positive alternatives; class struggle-solidarity unionism is such an alternative- one with real promise. We need organizing that fights for working class interests, like healthcare for all. It means creating solidarity in action opposing corporate globalization with the vision and strategy of global solidarity, not retreating to nationalist protectionism, like th UAW did in the ‘70s. For those who begin to question capitalism, this offers a way to create a world free of capitalist domination. Towards a world of freely associated working people, not people daily chained to working under corporate capital’s agenda.

Union caucuses are one way to fight back. They also begin to make real links instead of the go – it- alone reality of most unions. That’s where the outlook and practical fights for better working/

living conditions and publicly-funded healthcare have promise. These are concrete actions that counter ‘business-as-usual’ unionism. They could inspire real tangible support for

workers and union leaders making such moves. This could break though, making unions central to everyday life for millions of ‘ordinary people’. They could generate the support unions need now, more than ever. We are all connected like the cells in our body. The body is global capitalism. We, the cells that make it work, are like our immune system, only imbued with consciousness. We face the same implacable, inhuman, profits – above – all corporate agenda that generated today’s economic recession and real human suffering. We

have the same corporate face, from Chicago to China. We also have the capacity to link up into an effective immune response to cancer.

Solidarity isn’t just a nice idea; it’s a necessity and reality-based. The employers need to accumulate profits, using whatever they can, whether it’s technology to replace more expensive labor or cheaper labor. This drive generates our resistance, if only to defend ourselves, our families, and to fight for our future. Workers face this, mostly alone or in one plant or city or country. This class-based unionism has the potential to link us up, conscious of ourselves and our potential.

The internal SEIU fight between Stern and Rosselli opens up space for this resistance to grow. This resistance comes up just as naturally as the sun rises. It develops organically, just as our personal relationships do. Our understanding and creativity guide us as we face powerful opponents in corporate power and their union partners. We develop our democratic, cooperative, solidarity tools of struggle and resistance, just as car mechanics use the tools available to get the job done. We face many choices; nothing is predetermined. The outcomes will come from the conscious efforts of so many workers linked as cells in one body, just as the SEIU workers are linked with us all by the very system we live under. Their fight can add to the brewing movements for change, to benefit us all.

We all need to support and nourish them as we would our personal friends and family

In solidarity, Earl Silbar. Thanks to everyone for your help. You know who you are! Of course, all mistakes are my responsibility.

Source: http://www.substancenews.net/articles.php?page=73